Measure 66

It seems that every day there’s a new letter in the newspaper talking about how the “have nots” voted to gouge the “haves” in order to pay for state services.  So, is that actually true?

I took a look at the county by county results and compared that with the expected impact on the voters of each county.

M66_TaxCut

There is a very weak, basically insignificant correlation between the percentage of each county that voted for 66 and the percentage that will see a tax cut.  Not much to see here.

Looking at voting results versus the percent of each county’s population that is seeing their taxes go up was more interesting.

M66TaxIncrease

Here, the correlation is much stronger, but not in the direction the “No on 66” crowd would have you believe.

It could be that the poorer people in wealthier counties simply voted overwhelmingly to gouge their neighbors, which is certainly possible, in which case the “no on 66” crowd would have a point.  We won’t know for sure unless some detailed polling is done.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Measure 66

  1. Pingback: BEN

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>